Mayflower District Court
#state-of-mayflower-v-nukhz
This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-nukhz channel.
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-06 10:22 p.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Chambers of Judge Popplewell
krabz 2025-10-06 10:23 p.m.@Brenda
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-07 12:24 a.m. @krabz has added @Frost to the case channel.
Case Modified
krabz used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-07 12:24 a.m. @krabz has added @adriann to the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-10-07 12:42 a.m.@adriann Hello
adriann 2025-10-07 12:43 a.m.
Hi your honour
Brenda 2025-10-07 12:43 a.m.
Last time I presided over a criminal case was in 2024
Brenda 2025-10-07 12:44 a.m.
You'll have to remind me what the next step is
Brenda 2025-10-07 12:44 a.m.
Do you need a warrant?
Brenda 2025-10-07 12:44 a.m.@adriann
vloqsouls 2025-10-07 12:44 a.m.
Bomboclaaaaaaaaat
vloqsoulsBomboclaaaaaaaaat
Brenda 2025-10-07 12:44 a.m.
OUT
Brenda 2025-10-07 12:44 a.m.
NOW
BrendaDo you need a warrant?
adriann 2025-10-07 12:48 a.m.
Yes your honour
BrendaYou'll have to remind me what the next step is
adriann 2025-10-07 12:49 a.m.
I believe it is evaluating the presented information to establish probable cause for an arrest warrant
adriann 2025-10-07 12:51 a.m.
Either that or a summons
Brenda 2025-10-07 12:54 a.m.
Reviewing
adriannBrenda 2025-10-07 01:02 a.m.
I find probable cause
Brenda 2025-10-07 01:02 a.m.
I'm going to summon the Defendant
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-07 01:44 a.m. @Brenda has added @El Taco Man to the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-10-07 01:44 a.m.@El Taco Man Cause the attached Criminal Summons to be served on Nukhz immediately(edited)
Brenda 2025-10-07 01:54 a.m.@El Taco Man FIXED version
Brenda used /summon
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-07 01:59 a.m.:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @alex (edited)
El Taco Man 2025-10-07 03:08 a.m.@Clark County Sheriff's Office
El Taco Man 2025-10-07 03:08 a.m.
^
El Taco Man
𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥ 2025-10-07 03:09 a.m.
Thanks Tacos.(edited)
UserMessage could not be loaded.
El Taco Man 2025-10-07 03:12 a.m.
El Taco Man 2025-10-07 03:13 a.m.@Brenda
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-07 06:05 a.m. @Brenda has added @alex to the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-10-07 06:05 a.m.@alex
alex 2025-10-07 06:06 a.m.@Kezzera Hello chief YN.
I ask this to be reassigned as I believe this judge will have prejudice over me as I have made numerous comments in the past how they're not a lady and are infact a Boy.
I ask this to be reassigned as I believe this judge will have prejudice over me as I have made numerous comments in the past how they're not a lady and are infact a Boy.
alexBrenda 2025-10-07 06:28 a.m.
Hi. Denied
alex 2025-10-07 06:28 a.m.
See. Classic ladyboy prejudice
alexSee. Classic ladyboy prejudice
Brenda 2025-10-07 06:38 a.m.
I'm finding you in direct contempt under 1 MSC § 1501. I am entering a $50 fine which is payable within 30 minutes.
alex 2025-10-07 06:39 a.m.
I'm at work
alex 2025-10-07 06:39 a.m.
You should try it
Brenda 2025-10-07 06:39 a.m.
You will inform the court when you get off work so the fine can be administered
Brenda 2025-10-07 06:39 a.m.
Thank you.
alex 2025-10-07 06:40 a.m.
I get off work in 12 hours
alex 2025-10-07 06:40 a.m.
I need a state psychiatrist to assess my ability to stand trial please
alex 2025-10-07 06:40 a.m.
I would request two of them to be femboys from CCRH.
alex 2025-10-07 08:46 a.m.
Hello. This is my Notice to this Horrible corrupt Court that I will be indisposed for the next 3 weeks starting on the 8th of October due to a training exercise with my work in the brecon beacons. I will have no WIFI or internet during this period.
adriann 2025-10-07 10:40 a.m.
I thought the exercise ends on the 12th
adriannI thought the exercise ends on the 12th
alex 2025-10-07 11:04 a.m.
what
adriann 2025-10-07 11:53 a.m.
Ah
adriann 2025-10-07 11:53 a.m.
Must be something else
alex 2025-10-07 04:03 p.m.@Brenda Hello Judge ladyman, I am available for 10 minutes to pay my fine then it is bed time.
alexBrenda 2025-10-07 04:03 p.m.
Okay it will be entered now
Brenda 2025-10-07 04:06 p.m.
Issued
alex 2025-10-07 04:08 p.m.
Ok I had to take a loan out to pay this fine with the Mayflower State Militia, they charged me an interest rate of 500%, is this normal?
Brenda 2025-10-07 07:38 p.m.@alex @adriann
Open session
@alex : YOU MUST REPLY BY OCTOBER 8, 2002 AT 09:00 PM Eastern Time
I call this court to session for initial appearance of the defendant inState of Mayflower v. Nukhz, CR-163-25
Mr. Nukhz, I am going to first inform you of your rights:
With these rights in mind, please inform the court that you have understood them by saying:
If you do not understand them, you should ask the Court to explain it in a way you can understand.
You have been brought here on two misdemeanor offences and also two felony offenses, the most serious criminal offenses one can be charged with in the State. You have been given a copy of the document that formally charges you of such offenses (the criminal information) and a document outlining the facts, attested and sworn to be truthful by a police officer, which lead to you being charged with such offenses (this is called an affidavit).
The felony charges against you qualify as "high-risk offender" charges andwill have a severe impact on your future prospects in the community . It may impact your ability to maintain your current employment, any future employment, or whatever restrictions state law imposes on you as a consequence of your criminal conviction. You are required to register with the Mayflower Department of Justice as a high-risk offender if you are convicted of such offences by this court. You can only be convicted after a fair trial, or if you plead guilty to those offenses.
I have made it clear that you have a right to an attorney. I will ask you the following and you will respond in the same way:
1. Do you have an attorney that can represent you?
2. If not, are you able to afford one? (If you cannot afford one, you will be asked to provide evidence of this).
Your attorney is required to maintain a level of competence in representing you. If your attorney is harming your legal interests in any way, you should inform the court as soon as possible.
You have a duty to appear in court. It is not both just improper but also illegal to not appear in court. Because these proceedings are done remotely, you do not have to make a physical appearance today. I consider you fully appeared for the purpose of these proceedings. If I ever require you to appear physically, you must take necessary steps to do so. If you need assistance to make your appearance, you can ask the Court for assistance. We are now aware of your situation and have no interest in making a roleplay experience extremely difficult and unpleasant for you.
You may not require bail. If bail is necessary, the prosecutor@adriann should inform the Court and inform why. This may happen separately.
I call this court to session for initial appearance of the defendant in
Mr. Nukhz, I am going to first inform you of your rights:
1. You have the right to remain silent. You do not have to speak or provide any information that could incriminate you.
2. You have the right to an attorney present during any questioning or legal proceedings. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at no cost.
3. You have the right to a fair and public trial where evidence will be presented, and witnesses can be called to testify on your behalf.
4. You have the right to confront witnesses against you and test their evidence. You can question them in court.
With these rights in mind, please inform the court that you have understood them by saying:
I understand my rights as they were read to me.If you do not understand them, you should ask the Court to explain it in a way you can understand.
You have been brought here on two misdemeanor offences and also two felony offenses, the most serious criminal offenses one can be charged with in the State. You have been given a copy of the document that formally charges you of such offenses (the criminal information) and a document outlining the facts, attested and sworn to be truthful by a police officer, which lead to you being charged with such offenses (this is called an affidavit).
The felony charges against you qualify as "high-risk offender" charges and
I have made it clear that you have a right to an attorney. I will ask you the following and you will respond in the same way:
1. Do you have an attorney that can represent you?
2. If not, are you able to afford one? (If you cannot afford one, you will be asked to provide evidence of this).
Your attorney is required to maintain a level of competence in representing you. If your attorney is harming your legal interests in any way, you should inform the court as soon as possible.
You have a duty to appear in court. It is not both just improper but also illegal to not appear in court. Because these proceedings are done remotely, you do not have to make a physical appearance today. I consider you fully appeared for the purpose of these proceedings. If I ever require you to appear physically, you must take necessary steps to do so. If you need assistance to make your appearance, you can ask the Court for assistance. We are now aware of your situation and have no interest in making a roleplay experience extremely difficult and unpleasant for you.
You may not require bail. If bail is necessary, the prosecutor
alex 2025-10-08 02:46 a.m.
I understand my rights as they were read to me.
alex 2025-10-08 02:46 a.m.
1. @Anakin
alex 2025-10-08 02:47 a.m.@Brenda clear my record, i now have a warrant for not paying apparently
alex 2025-10-08 02:49 a.m.
heyyyy @Anakin
Brenda 2025-10-08 02:53 a.m.
Warrant has been revoked
Brenda 2025-10-08 02:57 a.m.@Anakin You have to run /appear in bot-commands and register your appearance for the Defendant
Brenda 2025-10-08 02:58 a.m.
The bot will add you to this channel once it's approved
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-08 03:02 a.m.Requester: @Anakin
Party:Nukhz
Channel:state-of-mayflower-v-nukhz
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. 
Request ID: 409dd2f3db104eb9b0e351e70196fd6f Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-08 03:08 a.m.@Anakin appears for Nukhz (approved by @Brenda ).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:08 a.m.
Hello
Brenda 2025-10-08 03:08 a.m.
Welcome
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:09 a.m.
If the court may allow, I’d like to request 72 hours to be caught up on the case - I have a midterm today and tomorrow, as well as a standing appointment with the bar tomorrow night.
AnakinIf the court may allow, I’d like to request 72 hours to be caught up on the case - I have a midterm today and tomorrow, as well as a standing appointment with the bar tomorrow nigh...
Brenda 2025-10-08 03:10 a.m.@adriann State?
AnakinIf the court may allow, I’d like to request 72 hours to be caught up on the case - I have a midterm today and tomorrow, as well as a standing appointment with the bar tomorrow nigh...
alex 2025-10-08 03:25 a.m.
2
Don't forget ur Senate visit to Israel on the weekend
2Brendaadriann 2025-10-08 03:33 a.m.
Your honour the State objects in the interest of justice and a timely resolution as we’re fully prepared to proceed, but we’ll defer to the court’s discretion
Brenda 2025-10-08 03:39 a.m.@Anakin @adriann @alex
The Court will accept Mr. Anakin's representations. I am scheduling arraignment for October 10, 2002, at 7 PM Eastern Time. If this time is inconvenient for Defendant or the State, please inform the Court immediately so it can be rescheduled -- by up to +3/-3 hours.
The Court will accept Mr. Anakin's representations. I am scheduling arraignment for October 10, 2002, at 7 PM Eastern Time. If this time is inconvenient for Defendant or the State, please inform the Court immediately so it can be rescheduled -- by up to +3/-3 hours.
Brenda 2025-10-08 03:39 a.m.
This will be conducted async
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:40 a.m.
Your honor, I’m current located in Italy and will likely be at a club at that time as well as 3 hours before and after
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:40 a.m.
I’m primarily free during the day GMT+1 otherwise I tend to be far too intoxicated to deal with roblox
Brendaalex 2025-10-08 03:40 a.m.
I'm away for 3 weeks starting in 20 minutes
alex 2025-10-08 03:41 a.m.
Lol.
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:41 a.m.
Yes my client will be traveling to Rhodesia to check on his families plantation, we do not expect to be able to maintain contact with him.
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:42 a.m.
Due to the lack of infrastructure
alexHello. This is my Notice to this Horrible corrupt Court that I will be indisposed for the next 3 weeks starting on the 8th of October due to a training exercise with my work in the...
alex 2025-10-08 03:42 a.m.
This
Brenda 2025-10-08 03:42 a.m.@alex You will make your representations through your attorney. Refrain from speaking in this channel.
alex 2025-10-08 03:42 a.m.
Why
alex 2025-10-08 03:42 a.m.1
I will Not be Gagged
1alex 2025-10-08 03:43 a.m.
I'm actually co-counsel
AnakinYour honor, I’m current located in Italy and will likely be at a club at that time as well as 3 hours before and after
Brenda 2025-10-08 03:44 a.m.
The Court is not terminating the arraignment because you intend to engage in alcoholic recreational activities. You will appear at 7 PM Eastern Time for the arraignment or you may discuss with @adriann in DMs to find a different time that works for both you and the State.(edited)
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:45 a.m.
It’ll likely be marijuana I’ll be indulging in, your honor.
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:45 a.m.
Perhaps I’ll go skiing as well
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:45 a.m.
Who knows
alex 2025-10-08 03:45 a.m.
Sir that is very late for us Lovely Europeans
alex 2025-10-08 03:45 a.m.
Not our fault we aren't stupid yanks(edited)
alex 2025-10-08 03:46 a.m.
I love England so fking Much
alex 2025-10-08 03:46 a.m.@Anakin we going to tommy's new trial?
alex 2025-10-08 03:46 a.m.
19th of October
alex 2025-10-08 03:47 a.m.@Kezzera Hey can this be reassigned yet
alex 2025-10-08 03:48 a.m.@Anakin I think we need an English judge(edited)
BrendaBrenda 2025-10-08 03:48 a.m.
*
Brenda 2025-10-08 03:48 a.m.3
Nukhz will be gagged for the remainder of these proceedings
3Brenda 2025-10-08 03:48 a.m.
His permission to speak in this channel will be restored at the arraignment and/or future proceedings.(edited)
adriann 2025-10-08 03:49 a.m.
Your honour I would like to bring to your attention the inconsistent explanations provided by the defense as to the defendant's indisposition
BrendaBrenda 2025-10-08 03:50 a.m.@adriann @Anakin @alex
Given that the Defendant and his counsel appears to not take this seriously, the arraignment scheduled above stands. Defendant is warned that if he fails to appear, a warrant for failure to appear may issue or the case may be tried in absentia.
Given that the Defendant and his counsel appears to not take this seriously, the arraignment scheduled above stands. Defendant is warned that if he fails to appear, a warrant for failure to appear may issue or the case may be tried in absentia.
Brenda 2025-10-08 03:51 a.m.
If Defendant has any motion(s) or representations to make, he will send them through his attorney, AnakinT0ast, or not at all.
alex19th of October
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:52 a.m.
I’m gonna be at Ac Milan - Firenze srry
BrendaAnakin 2025-10-08 03:53 a.m.
Hello I will not be present this time is inconvenient
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:53 a.m.
I request you remain mindful of other time zones
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:53 a.m.
And the fact that some of us might actually have a social life (shocker!)
Anakin 2025-10-08 03:53 a.m.
I will be taking my LOA now goodbye
AnakinHello I will not be present this time is inconvenient
Brenda 2025-10-08 03:58 a.m.
Then you will make use of the opportunity to reschedule by up to +3/-3 hours, or work with the State to find a different time
Brenda 2025-10-08 04:00 a.m.
I will give you 24 hours
Brenda 2025-10-08 04:00 a.m.
If you fail to make deal with the State in good faith to find a new time, I will consider the objections unserious
Anakin 2025-10-08 04:01 a.m.@adriann can you do Saturday at Noon GMT+1(edited)
Anakin 2025-10-08 04:01 a.m.
I should be recovered from hangover by then
adriann 2025-10-08 04:17 a.m.
The State objects to any delay based on counsel’s planned intoxication since this is neither a legitimate nor professional reason to postpone
adriann 2025-10-08 04:18 a.m.
We request that the court proceeds as scheduled or takes appropriate action to ensure that the defendant has competent representation
Anakin 2025-10-08 04:36 a.m. 
AnakinClick to see attachment.
adriann 2025-10-08 05:15 a.m.
Your honour the opposing counsel’s remark here is improper and disrespectful to the Court
adriann 2025-10-08 05:16 a.m.
We request that this behavior be addressed in order to preserve the integrity of the courtroom
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-08 01:33 p.m.Requester: @Toby
Party:Defendant
Channel:state-of-mayflower-v-nukhz
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. Request ID: 431544f3189e4d869a80eb2d82f7d12c Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-08 04:21 p.m.@Toby appears for Defendant (approved by @Brenda ).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
Toby 2025-10-08 04:23 p.m.@Anakin
Toby 2025-10-08 04:23 p.m.
Anakin 2025-10-08 04:23 p.m.
Thank god
Anakin 2025-10-08 04:23 p.m.
Time to go shrimp farm
Toby 2025-10-08 04:23 p.m.@Brenda where are we with this
BrendaBrenda 2025-10-08 06:05 p.m.
*
Brenda 2025-10-08 06:05 p.m.@Toby
adriann 2025-10-09 08:33 p.m.
May the record reflect that the delay is at the defense’s request and charged accordingly
Toby 2025-10-10 07:56 a.m.@Brenda We enter a plea of not guilty. God bless.
TobyBrenda 2025-10-10 04:14 p.m.
Is the Defendant waiving arraignment?
BrendaIs the Defendant waiving arraignment?
Toby 2025-10-10 04:39 p.m.
Yes
Brenda 2025-10-10 04:51 p.m.@adriann Objections?
adriann 2025-10-10 06:51 p.m.
No objections on the waiver in principle your honour, but we request the record reflect that the defendant understands the consequences
adriann 2025-10-10 06:52 p.m.
However given the court's prior warning to the defendant regarding appearance, we also request that the court consider whether accepting this late waiver is appropriate
TobyBrenda 2025-10-11 01:55 a.m.
The Court enters a plea of Not Guilty on all counts
@adriann @Toby
Brenda 2025-10-11 01:55 a.m.
I will enter a Scheduling Order shortly
Brenda 2025-10-11 01:57 a.m.@Toby @adriann @alex @Anakin
ORDER:IT IS ORDERED that the following schedule be entered:
Schedule for Pre-trial beginning October 11, 2002
---
- Discovery by Government (Brady, Giglio and other exculpatory material): October 15, 2002
- Discovery by Defendant (if any): October 16, 2002
- Disclosure of Witness Lists by both: October 16, 2002
- Pre-trial Motions: October 18, 2002
- Notices stipulating no discovery, no witness list or no motions (if any): respective deadlines set for each matter
- Notices of intended defenses involving alibi, public authority, or defense which may require substantial preparation: October 18, 2002 (does not exclude any defenses from presentation at trial)
All dates/times used in this Order, and future Orders, are in Eastern Time.
*Schedule may be amended upon joint agreement of parties, by the court or upon good cause shown by one party (and with objection shown, or the lack thereof)
ORDER:
---
- Discovery by Government (Brady, Giglio and other exculpatory material): October 15, 2002
- Discovery by Defendant (if any): October 16, 2002
- Disclosure of Witness Lists by both: October 16, 2002
- Pre-trial Motions: October 18, 2002
- Notices stipulating no discovery, no witness list or no motions (if any): respective deadlines set for each matter
- Notices of intended defenses involving alibi, public authority, or defense which may require substantial preparation: October 18, 2002 (does not exclude any defenses from presentation at trial)
*Schedule may be amended upon joint agreement of parties, by the court or upon good cause shown by one party (and with objection shown, or the lack thereof)
Brenda pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
adriann 2025-10-12 10:07 p.m.
Your honour, the State moves for sanctions against the defendant due to his conduct over the past several days as the defense has repeatedly shown flagrant disregard for this Court’s authority, mocked judicial instructions, and violated a previously imposed gag order. The Defendant has also cited contradictory and unserious excuses to avoid arraignment all while insulting the Court, so as a result of this we believe that the existing contempt fine was insufficient to deter misconduct and now seek stronger remedies.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17JIaYffSL1fM8YT_pgziFy8mLAUJUJ6V/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17JIaYffSL1fM8YT_pgziFy8mLAUJUJ6V/view?usp=sharing
Brenda 2025-10-13 02:16 a.m.@adriann Care to address this? 
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-13 02:22 a.m.Requester: @AlbertBlackwell
Party:Government
Channel:state-of-mayflower-v-nukhz
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. Request ID: 1e54126837ec4e329705726c6b5c1170 Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-13 02:27 a.m.@AlbertBlackwell appears for Government (approved by @Brenda ).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 03:12 p.m.
Brenda 2025-10-13 02:27 a.m.@AlbertBlackwell
Brenda
AlbertBlackwell 2025-10-13 02:28 a.m.
Hello your honour, I believe there was some confusion with this - as Mr. @adriann is doing this as part of his role in JAGC rather than MDOJ
AlbertBlackwell 2025-10-13 02:29 a.m.
While initially it was thought he was doing this fraudulently doing this for the MDOJ, this is not the case
adriann 2025-10-13 03:13 a.m.
All my filings clearly state I'm doing this on behalf of MNG
adriann 2025-10-13 03:13 a.m.
adriann Server2025-10-13 03:14 a.m.
adriann 2025-10-13 03:14 a.m. 
1
1adriann 2025-10-13 03:14 a.m.
cc @Brenda
adriannYour honour, the State moves for sanctions against the defendant due to his conduct over the past several days as the defense has repeatedly shown flagrant disregard for this Court...
Toby 2025-10-13 03:39 p.m.
"Consider the defendant’s conduct as adverse inference toward their credibility or guilt"(edited)
Toby 2025-10-13 03:39 p.m.
Are we actually fr
Toby 2025-10-13 05:00 p.m.@Brenda my client has asked me to inform the court that he would like to become ungaged and promises that from now on he will take these proceedings with the upmost seriousness
adriannYour honour, the State moves for sanctions against the defendant due to his conduct over the past several days as the defense has repeatedly shown flagrant disregard for this Court...
Brenda 2025-10-14 08:24 p.m.
Denied. AnakinT0ast has been replaced by Toby and is removed from this channel
Brenda used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-14 08:24 p.m. @Brenda has removed @Anakin from the case channel.
Case Modified
TobyBrenda 2025-10-14 08:24 p.m.
Denied
BrendaBrenda 2025-10-14 08:25 p.m.
We will regroup on October 19, 2002
BotclerkFlowClick to see command.
adriann 2025-10-15 12:36 a.m.
thx your honour
BrendaadriannToby 2025-10-15 07:32 a.m. 
TobyClick to see attachment.
adriann 2025-10-15 08:00 a.m.
Imgur links all work perfectly fine for me
adriann 2025-10-15 08:03 a.m.
Are you in the UK currently by any chance
adriannAre you in the UK currently by any chance
Toby 2025-10-15 08:37 a.m.
Yes
Toby 2025-10-15 08:37 a.m.
My client can't access it either
adriann 2025-10-15 04:45 p.m.From September 30, 2025, access to Imgur from the United Kingdom is no longer available. UK users will not be able to log in, view content, or upload images. Imgur content embedded on third-party s... 
TobyMy client can't access it either
adriann 2025-10-15 04:47 p.m.
What image hosting sites are still unbanned in the UK
Toby 2025-10-15 04:48 p.m.
I don't know, but it isn't admissible if neither me nor my client can access it
Toby 2025-10-15 04:48 p.m.
I think gyazo might work
adriannBrenda 2025-10-16 05:47 a.m.
Exhibit A is not available
BrendaExhibit A is not available
adriann 2025-10-16 05:57 a.m.
Exhibit A is a video recording made by the defendant himself from his POV of the incident which he formerly uploaded to his own account on medal until recently as it was accessible not long ago (Within 48 hours)
adriann 2025-10-16 05:58 a.m.
It is to our belief the video has become unavailable due to the deletion and removal of the clip
Toby 2025-10-16 04:23 p.m.DEFENCE'S DISCOVERY & WITNESS LIST
@adriann @Brenda
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1drm0yGpe2v2IWFUYSO8JLRtnIcsoHePz/view?usp=sharing
Brenda 2025-10-19 06:57 a.m.@adriann @Toby @alex
SCHEDULING ORDER: Bench Trial scheduled for 10/20/2002 at 7:00 PM Eastern Time. Estimated length of trial is 5 days. The trial will be conducted asynchronously.
SCHEDULING ORDER: Bench Trial scheduled for 10/20/2002 at 7:00 PM Eastern Time. Estimated length of trial is 5 days. The trial will be conducted asynchronously.
Toby 2025-10-19 02:40 p.m.
Ok
Brenda 2025-10-20 10:53 p.m.@adriann @Toby @alex Okay we’re in session
Brenda 2025-10-20 10:53 p.m.@adriann the State has 24 hours to deliver its opening statement
adriann 2025-10-21 01:38 a.m.
May it please the Court.
This case is about an individual who, while entrusted with the authority and privilege of serving within the Mayflower National Guard, chose to disregard both the law and the obligations of his position. On August 29th 2025, a hit and run involving a Military Police officer occurred as a result of the actions of the defendant Major Nukhz. The incident was promptly followed by his refusal to comply with lawful orders, and ultimately his deliberate attempt to flee apprehension.
The evidence will reflect that at the front gate of Fort Standish, the defendant operated a National Guard staff car and struck military police officer Specialist DavidEscalus, who was in uniform and clearly identifiable. Instead of stopping or even acknowledging what had just occurred, the defendant drove away. That act alone forms the foundation of the hit and run charge, which is a felony under 1 M.S.C. § 2306. The Court will then see through the provided video evidence that Specialist DavidEscalus immediately pursued the defendant in a marked military police vehicle with his sirens and emergency lights fully engaged. The defendant was ordered to stop and instructed to exit the vehicle, but despite these clear and lawful commands he refused to comply. Instead, the defendant continued to flee while continuing to engage in actions to prevent a lawful detention. This conduct forms the basis of the evasion as well as the failure to comply charges against the defendant under 1 M.S.C. § 1307 and 1 M.S.C. § 1305. As the evidence will further demonstrate, the defendant’s actions were not only unlawful but also a misuse of his position and the privileges of rank. By using his duty vehicle for personal and unlawful purposes and by committing these offenses while on duty and in uniform, the defendant engaged in gross misconduct under 1 M.S.C. § 1303.
This case is about an individual who, while entrusted with the authority and privilege of serving within the Mayflower National Guard, chose to disregard both the law and the obligations of his position. On August 29th 2025, a hit and run involving a Military Police officer occurred as a result of the actions of the defendant Major Nukhz. The incident was promptly followed by his refusal to comply with lawful orders, and ultimately his deliberate attempt to flee apprehension.
The evidence will reflect that at the front gate of Fort Standish, the defendant operated a National Guard staff car and struck military police officer Specialist DavidEscalus, who was in uniform and clearly identifiable. Instead of stopping or even acknowledging what had just occurred, the defendant drove away. That act alone forms the foundation of the hit and run charge, which is a felony under 1 M.S.C. § 2306. The Court will then see through the provided video evidence that Specialist DavidEscalus immediately pursued the defendant in a marked military police vehicle with his sirens and emergency lights fully engaged. The defendant was ordered to stop and instructed to exit the vehicle, but despite these clear and lawful commands he refused to comply. Instead, the defendant continued to flee while continuing to engage in actions to prevent a lawful detention. This conduct forms the basis of the evasion as well as the failure to comply charges against the defendant under 1 M.S.C. § 1307 and 1 M.S.C. § 1305. As the evidence will further demonstrate, the defendant’s actions were not only unlawful but also a misuse of his position and the privileges of rank. By using his duty vehicle for personal and unlawful purposes and by committing these offenses while on duty and in uniform, the defendant engaged in gross misconduct under 1 M.S.C. § 1303.
adriann 2025-10-21 01:38 a.m.
The State will respectfully ask this Court to find the defendant guilty on all counts at the conclusion of this trial, not because of his rank or position, but because the facts and the evidence demand it. The defendant's conduct has betrayed the trust placed in him as an officer and brings discredit to the uniform he wore.
Thank you, Your Honour.
Thank you, Your Honour.
@Brenda @Toby
Brenda 2025-10-21 01:54 a.m.@Toby 24 hours to make opening statement
BrendaToby 2025-10-21 06:46 a.m.1
We reserve(edited)
1Brenda 2025-10-21 06:56 a.m.@adriann Please call your first witness
adriann 2025-10-21 07:00 a.m.
I call @NickValdev
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-21 07:03 a.m. @Brenda has added @NickValdev to the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-10-21 07:03 a.m.@NickValdev
Brenda 2025-10-21 07:03 a.m.@adriann
adriannI call @NickValdev
Brenda 2025-10-21 07:03 a.m.
cc: @alex @Toby
Brendaadriann 2025-10-21 07:04 a.m.
Would you like me to administer oath as the clerk your honour
Brenda 2025-10-21 07:06 a.m.@NickValdev Do you swear or solemnly affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?
adriannWould you like me to administer oath as the clerk your honour
Toby 2025-10-21 07:29 a.m.
Brenda
NickValdev 2025-10-21 12:39 p.m.
I do.
NickValdevI do.
Brenda 2025-10-21 12:45 p.m.@adriann
Toby 2025-10-21 04:00 p.m.@adriann
adriann 2025-10-21 04:32 p.m.@NickValdev Please state your name, rank, and occupation for the record
Toby 2025-10-21 07:46 p.m.@NickValdev
adriannNickValdev 2025-10-21 11:02 p.m.
Apologies, I was at work.
In regards to this case, I would be DavidEscalus, Specialist, 18th Military Police Brigade - Mayflower National Guard.
In regards to this case, I would be DavidEscalus, Specialist, 18th Military Police Brigade - Mayflower National Guard.
adriann 2025-10-22 12:32 a.m.@NickValdev Where were you on-duty on August 29, 2025?
adriannToby 2025-10-22 07:40 a.m.
Objection lack of foundation
Toby 2025-10-22 07:40 a.m.@Brenda
Toby 2025-10-22 07:40 a.m.
Or rather assuming facts not in evidence
Brenda 2025-10-22 07:46 a.m.
Sustained
Brenda 2025-10-22 07:46 a.m.@adriann @Toby @NickValdev (edited)
NickValdevApologies, I was at work. In regards to this case, I would be DavidEscalus, Specialist, 18th Military Police Brigade - Mayflower National Guard.
adriann 2025-10-22 07:47 a.m.
^^
adriann 2025-10-22 07:51 a.m.@NickValdev Where you on-duty as a Mayflower National Guard Military Police officer on August 29, 2025?
Toby 2025-10-22 08:40 a.m.@Brenda Objection leading, assuming facts not in evidence
TobyBrenda 2025-10-22 08:46 a.m.
Sustained @adriann
adriannadriann 2025-10-22 08:48 a.m.
I meant to type "were" here
adriann 2025-10-22 08:52 a.m.@NickValdev Were you on-duty on August 29 2025?
adriannNickValdev 2025-10-22 10:50 a.m.
I was
NickValdevI was
adriann 2025-10-22 10:51 a.m.
What role were you serving as on that day?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 10:51 a.m.
Military Police
NickValdev 2025-10-22 10:52 a.m.
I'm sorry I must be gone for a bit. 1 hour mad
NickValdev 2025-10-22 10:52 a.m.
max*
adriannWhat role were you serving as on that day?
Toby 2025-10-22 10:53 a.m.@Brenda Objection
Toby 2025-10-22 10:53 a.m.
vague
NickValdevMilitary Police
adriann 2025-10-22 10:53 a.m.
Where were you stationed while on duty that day?
Toby 2025-10-22 10:54 a.m.
Excuse me
Toby 2025-10-22 10:54 a.m.
pending objection
TobyBrenda 2025-10-22 11:37 a.m.
Overruled @adriann
adriannWhere were you stationed while on duty that day?
adriann 2025-10-22 11:38 a.m.@NickValdev
NickValdevMilitary Police
Toby 2025-10-22 11:44 a.m.@Brenda Objection vague, military police of what?
Toby 2025-10-22 11:48 a.m.
for all we know he could be saying he's militia military police
TobyBrenda 2025-10-22 11:49 a.m.
Sustained. Witness will clarify before answering the next question @NickValdev @adriann
Tobyfor all we know he could be saying he's militia military police
adriann 2025-10-22 11:50 a.m.
militia doesnt have military police
adriann 2025-10-22 11:50 a.m.
you mean militia protections?
adriannmilitia doesnt have military police
adriann 2025-10-22 11:52 a.m.@Brenda
Tobyadriann 2025-10-22 11:53 a.m.
There is only one military police brigade in Clark County
Tobyadriann 2025-10-22 11:58 a.m.
Your honour this objection is without merit
Brenda 2025-10-22 12:00 p.m.
The objection has been sustained. The witness will clarify his answer
Toby 2025-10-22 02:42 p.m.@NickValdev
NickValdev 2025-10-22 04:23 p.m.
military police of the national guard of the state of mayflower of the union of columbia, a nation which exists on the roblox platform
NickValdev 2025-10-22 04:23 p.m.
clarified
adriann 2025-10-22 04:27 p.m.@NickValdev Where were you stationed while on duty that day?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 04:29 p.m.
i was stationed at the front gate entrance/exit checkpoint of fort standish, the installation owned by the union of columbia and operated by the mayflower national guard, a sect of the union of columbia army
NickValdevi was stationed at the front gate entrance/exit checkpoint of fort standish, the installation owned by the union of columbia and operated by the mayflower national guard, a sect of...
adriann 2025-10-22 04:31 p.m.
Do you recall encountering the defendant Major Nukhz that day?
adriannDo you recall encountering the defendant Major Nukhz that day?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 04:35 p.m.
Yes
NickValdevYes
adriann 2025-10-22 04:36 p.m.
Can you please describe for the Court what first drew your attention to him?
adriannCan you please describe for the Court what first drew your attention to him?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 04:37 p.m.
the defendant struck me with a car and didnt stop his vehicle to address the collision
NickValdevthe defendant struck me with a car and didnt stop his vehicle to address the collision
adriann 2025-10-22 04:38 p.m.
After the collision occurred, what did you do?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 04:39 p.m.
I ran to my vehicle and initiated a chase utilizing my emergency equipment mounted to the vehicle
NickValdevI ran to my vehicle and initiated a chase utilizing my emergency equipment mounted to the vehicle
adriann 2025-10-22 04:48 p.m.
At any point during that pursuit did you make verbal contact with the defendant?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 04:54 p.m.
Yes
NickValdevYes
adriann 2025-10-22 05:05 p.m.
How close were you to the defendant when you made verbal contact?
adriannHow close were you to the defendant when you made verbal contact?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 05:21 p.m.
I can't approximate an exact stud amount. Close enough he could see what I said as I was able to see the text of those in his vehicle.
NickValdevI can't approximate an exact stud amount. Close enough he could see what I said as I was able to see the text of those in his vehicle.
adriann 2025-10-22 05:24 p.m.
How did the defendant respond to you?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 05:24 p.m.
By saying "Why" and driving away, without complying to the multitude of lawful demands.
NickValdevBy saying "Why" and driving away, without complying to the multitude of lawful demands.
adriann 2025-10-22 05:25 p.m.
Would you please recall for the court what you said?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 05:26 p.m.
An assortment of demands to get out, exit, and stop the vehicle. Exact quotes in the exact order can be found in the evidence available to this court, however I don't recall word-for-word what order I said them in as this was two months ago.
NickValdevBy saying "Why" and driving away, without complying to the multitude of lawful demands.
adriann 2025-10-22 05:29 p.m.
What did you do at that point?
NickValdev 2025-10-22 05:31 p.m.
I tried to remove him from the vehicle, though was unsuccessful as he continued to relock the vehicle and drive away. I then got back in my car and chased him until we were inside Fort Standish at which point I attempted a standard law enforcement vehicle pursuit technique referred to as a "desync" and finally managing to remove him from the vehicle and placing him in handcuffs.
NickValdevI can't approximate an exact stud amount. Close enough he could see what I said as I was able to see the text of those in his vehicle.
Toby 2025-10-22 05:53 p.m.@Brenda Objection speculation
Toby 2025-10-22 05:53 p.m.
"close enough"
Toby 2025-10-22 05:56 p.m.@Brenda I move for sanctions to be placed upon the witness
Toby 2025-10-22 05:56 p.m. 
Tobyadriann 2025-10-22 06:51 p.m.
D. Mayfl. LR 4(2)(1)
Toby 2025-10-22 06:53 p.m.
?
Toby 2025-10-22 06:54 p.m.
I love it when people cite things without explaining it
adriann 2025-10-22 06:55 p.m.@Brenda Your honour the use of "close enough" in this statement is based on the witness' judgment that the distance was sufficient for visual recognition
Toby 2025-10-22 06:58 p.m.
"I can't approximate an exact stud amount. Close enough he could see what I said as I was able to see the text of those in his vehicle."
Toby 2025-10-22 06:58 p.m.
He isn't sure
Toby 2025-10-22 06:58 p.m.
Thus he is speculating
Toby"I can't approximate an exact stud amount. Close enough he could see what I said as I was able to see the text of those in his vehicle."
adriann 2025-10-22 06:59 p.m.
If it's based off personal perception this is a reasonable inference from firsthand observation and not a guess.
NickValdev 2025-10-22 06:59 p.m.
Am I allowed to clarify? @adriann @Toby
NickValdev 2025-10-22 07:00 p.m.
Additionally words are apparently necessary to ensure the statement I am making is conveyed
Toby 2025-10-22 07:00 p.m.
Im sorry why is the witness talking
adriannIf it's based off personal perception this is a reasonable inference from firsthand observation and not a guess.
Toby 2025-10-22 07:01 p.m.
Im not cross talking anymore
TobyIm sorry why is the witness talking
adriann 2025-10-22 07:04 p.m.
The witness is requesting permission to clarify on a prior testimony
adriann 2025-10-22 07:04 p.m.
nothing to be sorry about
adriann 2025-10-22 07:04 p.m.
I forgive you
Toby 2025-10-22 07:25 p.m.
Be quiet pipsqueak
NickValdevI can't approximate an exact stud amount. Close enough he could see what I said as I was able to see the text of those in his vehicle.
Brenda 2025-10-23 12:05 a.m.
"Close enough he could see what I said as I was able to see the text of those in his vehicle." is struck as non-responsive and speculative @adriann @Toby @NickValdev
adriann 2025-10-23 12:38 a.m.@NickValdev I am now showing you what’s been marked as State’s Exhibit B. Do you recognize it?
https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/kZOmCzkyTYAmO-3oL234 Views - Watch nukhz by NickValdev and millions of other Roblox videos on Medal. Tags: #roblox, #clarkcounty 
https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/kZOmCzkyTYAmO-3oL
NickValdev 2025-10-23 12:41 a.m.
I do.
NickValdevI do.
adriann 2025-10-23 12:44 a.m.
Is this video a fair and accurate depiction of what occurred that day?
NickValdev 2025-10-23 12:44 a.m.
Yes.
adriann 2025-10-23 12:47 a.m.
Your honour the State moves to admit Exhibit B into evidence. @Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-23 12:50 a.m.@Toby
BrendaToby 2025-10-23 04:24 a.m.
We object to lack of foundation
Brenda 2025-10-23 05:15 a.m.
Sustained @adriann @Toby @NickValdev
adriannBrenda 2025-10-23 05:16 a.m.
Struck
NickValdevI do.
Brenda 2025-10-23 05:16 a.m.
Struck
adriannIs this video a fair and accurate depiction of what occurred that day?
Brenda 2025-10-23 05:16 a.m.
Struck
NickValdevYes.
Brenda 2025-10-23 05:16 a.m.
Struck
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-23 08:17 a.m.@Toby please upload attachments for State of Mayflower v. Nukhz now. You can send multiple messages. Type
Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
donejudicialFLOW Bot2025-10-23 08:18 a.m.@Toby No attachments in that message. Upload file(s) or type
donejudicialFLOW Bot2025-10-23 08:18 a.m.@Toby accepted 1 file(s). (Total: 1/5)
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-23 08:18 a.m.@Toby You can upload 4 more — or type
doneToby 2025-10-23 08:18 a.m.
done
UserMessage could not be loaded.
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-23 08:18 a.m.
Uploaded 1/1 file(s).
adriann 2025-10-23 10:03 a.m.@NickValdev Did you record any video during your interaction with the defendant on August 29, 2025?
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-23 10:08 a.m.@adriann please upload attachments for State of Mayflower v. Nukhz now. You can send multiple messages. Type
Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
donejudicialFLOW Bot2025-10-23 10:09 a.m.@adriann accepted 1 file(s). (Total: 1/5)
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-23 10:09 a.m.@adriann You can upload 4 more — or type
doneadriann 2025-10-23 10:09 a.m.
done
UserMessage could not be loaded.
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-23 10:09 a.m.
Uploaded 1/1 file(s).
adriannadriann 2025-10-23 10:09 a.m.@NickValdev
Toby 2025-10-23 12:00 p.m.@NickValdev
adriannNickValdev 2025-10-23 12:46 p.m.
I did.
Toby 2025-10-23 02:16 p.m.@adriann
adriann 2025-10-23 04:12 p.m.@NickValdev Is this the same video now marked as the State's Exhibit B?
adriannadriann 2025-10-23 04:12 p.m.
^^
adriannNickValdev 2025-10-23 04:13 p.m.
Yes.
NickValdevYes.
adriann 2025-10-23 04:15 p.m.
Is this a true and accurate depiction of what you observed that day?
NickValdev 2025-10-23 04:15 p.m.
Yes.
NickValdevYes.
adriann 2025-10-23 04:15 p.m.
Has it been altered, edited, or modified in any way?
NickValdev 2025-10-23 04:16 p.m.
Only to shorten the original media file. My medal is set to upload 20 minutes worth of content, most of which was irrelevant. The material actually in the clip is unmodified.
NickValdevOnly to shorten the original media file. My medal is set to upload 20 minutes worth of content, most of which was irrelevant. The material actually in the clip is unmodified.
adriann 2025-10-23 04:24 p.m.
Was the substance of what’s shown in this clip from the moment the defendant arrived at the gate to the point of detainment altered or changed in any way?
NickValdev 2025-10-23 04:24 p.m.
No.
Toby 2025-10-23 04:24 p.m.@Brenda please order the prosecution and the witness to be quicker with their questions and answers. Trial is due to end tomorrow.
NickValdevNo.
adriann 2025-10-23 04:24 p.m.
Has anything been added, deleted, or modified in the portion we’re viewing?
adriannHas anything been added, deleted, or modified in the portion we’re viewing?
Toby 2025-10-23 04:25 p.m.
Objection
Toby 2025-10-23 04:25 p.m.
Asked and answered
NickValdev 2025-10-23 04:25 p.m.
Wait until this dude learns about my 4 hour shift scheduled to start in a half hour.
This is my notice I will be leaving soon, by the way.
This is my notice I will be leaving soon, by the way.
NickValdev 2025-10-23 04:25 p.m.
5 hour*
TobyAsked and answered
adriann 2025-10-23 04:25 p.m.
No I asked if the original clip has any changes
adriann 2025-10-23 04:25 p.m.
Not this one
adriann 2025-10-23 04:25 p.m.
Please observe carefully before objecting
adriannNo I asked if the original clip has any changes
Toby 2025-10-23 04:26 p.m.
You asked if the clip had been altered
Toby 2025-10-23 04:26 p.m.
That is the same question worded different
TobyYou asked if the clip had been altered
adriann 2025-10-23 04:26 p.m.
The original one, which has been length wise as answered by the witness
adriann 2025-10-23 04:26 p.m.
Now I'm asking about this portion
Toby 2025-10-23 04:26 p.m.
Its the same clip
Toby 2025-10-23 04:26 p.m.
No other variant has been submitted
Toby 2025-10-23 04:26 p.m.
Your first question still applies to the first clip
TobyNo other variant has been submitted
adriann 2025-10-23 04:27 p.m.
Right but it was taken from a substantially longer session clip
Toby 2025-10-23 04:27 p.m.
Which isn't in evidence
TobyYour first question still applies to the first clip
adriann 2025-10-23 04:27 p.m.
Indeed it does
Toby 2025-10-23 04:27 p.m.
Nor submitted(edited)
TobyNor submitted(edited)
adriann 2025-10-23 04:27 p.m.
Because it isn't entirely relevant to the case
Toby 2025-10-23 04:27 p.m.
Ok what
Toby 2025-10-23 04:27 p.m.
Im not arguing anymore
adriann 2025-10-23 04:27 p.m.
First time witness established the clip was trimmed which = edited from a much longer clip
adriann 2025-10-23 04:28 p.m.
Now I'm asking if any changes were made to the portion submitted and being used
Toby 2025-10-23 04:28 p.m.
Im not cross talking anymore, allow the judge to rule
adriann 2025-10-23 04:28 p.m.
You want us to be quicker with examination yet you object left and right which forces us to halt questioning and wait for the judge
Toby 2025-10-23 04:29 p.m.
Then don't ask objectionable questions
Toby 2025-10-23 04:29 p.m.
Not my problem
TobyThen don't ask objectionable questions
adriann 2025-10-23 04:29 p.m.
It doesn't have to be object able for you to object
Toby 2025-10-23 04:29 p.m.
What
Toby 2025-10-23 04:29 p.m.
Make that make sense
TobyMake that make sense
adriann 2025-10-23 04:30 p.m.
You can object to things that get overruled
Toby 2025-10-23 04:31 p.m.
You actually make no sense
Toby 2025-10-23 04:31 p.m.
Give it a rest
adriann 2025-10-23 04:31 p.m.
but even if it does get overruled we still have to wait
BrendaOverruled @adriann
adriann 2025-10-23 04:31 p.m.@Toby
Toby 2025-10-23 04:31 p.m.
Omg be quiet
Toby 2025-10-23 04:31 p.m.
Holy hell
adriann 2025-10-23 04:32 p.m.
Almost every single question is objected to which forces a halt in examination for an indefinite amount of time (baseless or not) and you urge an order for us to be quicker while we are spending every second of availability checking in on this
Toby 2025-10-23 04:33 p.m.
Why are you still talking
adriann 2025-10-23 04:50 p.m.
Your honour I ask that the record reflect defense counsel’s remarks and respectfully request that the court remind counsel of proper decorum
adriannYour honour I ask that the record reflect defense counsel’s remarks and respectfully request that the court remind counsel of proper decorum
adriann 2025-10-23 04:50 p.m.@Brenda
Toby 2025-10-23 04:57 p.m.
I ask for the prosecution to be censured
TobyObjection
Brenda 2025-10-24 07:38 a.m.
Sustained
Brenda 2025-10-24 07:38 a.m.
The question and answer are struck
Brenda 2025-10-24 07:38 a.m.@adriann @Toby
Toby 2025-10-24 11:08 a.m.@adriann
adriann 2025-10-24 02:51 p.m.@Brenda The State seeks to reintroduce Exhibit B for admittance into evidence. The State notes that the original recording was 20 minutes long, and the only edits made were to trim portions before and after the incident none of which depicted any interaction between the witness and the defendant. The relevant events remain unaltered, and the witness can testify that this excerpt is a fair and accurate depiction of what occurred.
Toby 2025-10-24 04:46 p.m.
I don't even think I have to state this..... but the state has again failed to lay the foundation to admit this into evidence, thus we object
adriann 2025-10-24 05:18 p.m.
The foundation has been properly laid
adriann 2025-10-24 05:19 p.m.
The witness identified the recording presented, explained when and how it was obtained, and verified that it accurately depicts this incident on August 29 2025
Toby 2025-10-25 11:39 a.m.
thats only part
Toby 2025-10-25 11:40 a.m.
of laying the foundation
Toby 2025-10-25 11:40 a.m.
theres a lot more to it
Toby 2025-10-25 05:42 p.m.@Brenda
Toby 2025-10-26 09:43 a.m.@Brenda Hello
adriannBrenda 2025-10-26 09:47 a.m.
Exhibit B is admitted, continue @Toby @adriann @NickValdev
adriann 2025-10-26 09:58 a.m.@NickValdev Directing your attention to timestamp 0:06 of exhibit B, is this where the impact occurred?
adriannadriann 2025-10-26 09:58 a.m.
^^
NickValdev 2025-10-26 12:50 p.m.
Yes
adriann 2025-10-26 04:13 p.m.@NickValdev at timestamp 1:17 what are you telling the defendant?
NickValdev 2025-10-26 04:17 p.m.
i am telling him he is being detained
adriann 2025-10-26 04:24 p.m.@NickValdev Can you describe what happened at the 0:39 timestamp?
NickValdev 2025-10-26 04:26 p.m.
I approached the vehicle and began speaking to the occupants, specifically the driver
NickValdevI approached the vehicle and began speaking to the occupants, specifically the driver
adriann 2025-10-26 04:28 p.m.
What happened after you approached the vehicle and spoke to the driver?
NickValdev 2025-10-26 04:29 p.m.
The driver refused to comply with orders to stop and continued to slowly drive away even after being directly told he was detained.
adriann 2025-10-26 04:33 p.m.@NickValdev At 2:45 of exhibit B, what did the defendant do with the fort gate?
NickValdev 2025-10-26 04:35 p.m.
He closed the gate after passing it, knowingly preventing me from proceeding through whilst informed that he was detained.
NickValdevHe closed the gate after passing it, knowingly preventing me from proceeding through whilst informed that he was detained.
Toby 2025-10-26 04:45 p.m.@Brenda Objection
Toby 2025-10-26 04:45 p.m.
The witness cannot speak to my clients state of mind
Toby 2025-10-26 04:45 p.m.
or his intentions
adriannadriann 2025-10-26 04:46 p.m.
Question withdrawn
adriann 2025-10-26 04:47 p.m.@NickValdev At the 2:45 timestamp of exhibit B, what did the defendant do with the fort gate?
NickValdevHe closed the gate after passing it, knowingly preventing me from proceeding through whilst informed that he was detained.
adriann 2025-10-26 04:50 p.m.@Brenda Move to strike the last statement made by the defendant your honour
TobyBrenda 2025-10-26 04:53 p.m.
Sustained
NickValdevHe closed the gate after passing it, knowingly preventing me from proceeding through whilst informed that he was detained.
Brenda 2025-10-26 04:53 p.m.
Struck
Brenda 2025-10-26 04:53 p.m.@adriann @Toby
adriannadriann 2025-10-26 04:54 p.m.@NickValdev
adriannNickValdev 2025-10-26 05:09 p.m.
He closed the gate after passing it, preventing me from proceeding through after I informed him that he was detained.
NickValdevHe closed the gate after passing it, preventing me from proceeding through after I informed him that he was detained.
adriann 2025-10-26 07:24 p.m.@NickValdev Can you describe what happened to your vehicle while it was passing underneath the gate?
NickValdev 2025-10-27 01:32 a.m.
It was hit by the closing gate and disabled until I was able to reopen the gate myself.
adriann 2025-10-27 02:01 a.m.@NickValdev How certain are you that the defendant was the same individual who struck you at the gate moments earlier?
adriannToby 2025-10-27 08:24 a.m.
Objection calls for speculation
Toby 2025-10-27 08:24 a.m.@Brenda
Brenda 2025-10-27 03:39 p.m.
Sustained @adriann @NickValdev @Toby
adriann 2025-10-27 05:36 p.m.@NickValdev You mentioned being struck by the defendant’s vehicle, can you explain what injuries you sustained?
NickValdev 2025-10-27 10:45 p.m.
I was knocked over and sustained a loss to my in game health.
adriann 2025-10-28 05:14 p.m.@NickValdev Did you observe any indication that the defendant was confused or impaired?
adriannToby 2025-10-28 05:43 p.m.@Brenda objection, the witness cannot speak to my clients state of mind
adriannadriann 2025-10-28 06:02 p.m.
"observe any indications"
Brenda 2025-10-28 08:21 p.m.
Overruled
adriannadriann 2025-10-28 08:42 p.m.@NickValdev
adriannNickValdev 2025-10-28 11:10 p.m.
I did not.
adriann 2025-10-29 04:19 a.m.
Thank you
adriann 2025-10-29 04:21 a.m.
I would now like to direct your attention to what has been marked as the State's Exhibit C
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_AwcovVqJMWmScrx3rszpgG8aA6n0rlt
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_AwcovVqJMWmScrx3rszpgG8aA6n0rlt
adriann 2025-10-29 04:21 a.m.@NickValdev did you complete a detainment receipt following this incident?
NickValdev 2025-10-29 04:42 a.m.
Yes
adriann 2025-10-29 03:12 p.m.@NickValdev Was preparing a detainment receipt part of your regular duties as a Military Police officer?
adriannNickValdev 2025-10-29 03:59 p.m.
Yes, per MP policy we are required to report anytime we detain a guardsman.
NickValdev 2025-10-29 04:01 p.m.
"We" refers to members of MP.
adriann 2025-10-29 04:04 p.m.@NickValdev Did you make this record at or near the time of the events, and to accurately describe what occurred?
NickValdev 2025-10-29 04:05 p.m.
Yes.
adriannI would now like to direct your attention to what has been marked as the State's Exhibit C https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_AwcovVqJMWmScrx3rszpgG8aA6n0rlt
adriann 2025-10-29 04:05 p.m.@NickValdev Is this a true and accurate copy of the detainment receipt you completed that day?
NickValdev 2025-10-29 04:07 p.m.
Yes.
adriann 2025-10-29 04:08 p.m.@NickValdev Has it been altered or changed in any way since you prepared it?
NickValdev 2025-10-29 04:08 p.m.
Not to my knowledge.
adriann 2025-10-29 04:11 p.m.@NickValdev Do you have reason to believe that what’s shown here is different from what you created?
NickValdev 2025-10-29 04:12 p.m.
I do not.
adriann 2025-10-29 04:13 p.m.@NickValdev To your understanding, this is the document you prepared?
NickValdev 2025-10-29 04:16 p.m.
Yes.
adriannToby 2025-10-29 04:51 p.m.@Brenda Objection
Toby 2025-10-29 04:51 p.m.
compound
adriannToby 2025-10-29 04:51 p.m.
Objection, asked and answered
Brenda 2025-10-29 04:54 p.m.
Sustained as to both objections
adriann 2025-10-29 07:35 p.m.@NickValdev Did you make this record at the time of the events?
NickValdev 2025-10-29 07:41 p.m.
I made it after the time of events, but within the same calendar day.
adriann 2025-10-29 08:14 p.m.@Brenda Your honour the State moves to admit Exhibit C into evidence
Toby 2025-10-30 07:39 a.m.
We object to lack of foundation
Brenda 2025-10-30 07:40 a.m.
Overruled
Brenda 2025-10-30 07:40 a.m.
Exhibit C is admitted @adriann @NickValdev @Toby
adriann 2025-10-30 09:42 a.m.@NickValdev In the detainment receipt you wrote that you intended to conduct an arrest against the defendant, why did you make that decision?
NickValdev 2025-10-30 12:57 p.m.
The defendant was extremely noncompliant and from my perspective, utilizing my experience as a peace officer I perceived a felony to have been committed.
adriann 2025-10-30 08:24 p.m.@NickValdev Does the detainment receipt list the vehicle involved in the collision?
adriannNickValdev 2025-10-30 10:50 p.m.
It does, but not by the manufacturer name. It lists it by description.
NickValdev 2025-10-30 10:51 p.m.
This was due to me failing to recollect the spelling of the vehicle name.
adriann 2025-10-31 07:28 a.m.@NickValdev Is this the same vehicle you observed in Exhibit B?
NickValdev 2025-10-31 08:50 a.m.
Yes
adriann 2025-10-31 09:28 a.m.@NickValdev How did you confirm the vehicle and driver’s identity when writing the document?
adriannNickValdev 2025-10-31 09:29 a.m.
While writing the document I simply referred back to my clip, or as this court knows, exhibit B, which blatantly confirms such information
adriann 2025-10-31 09:31 a.m.@NickValdev Have you reviewed the detainment receipt since the incident to verify that it remains accurate?
NickValdev 2025-10-31 09:32 a.m.
I have not.
Internally to MP, once we submit the receipt we no longer have access to track the proceedings that it is used in, as those are handled by the Army CID.
The original copy I uploaded to the Army CID was uneditable and only I maintained access, so it would be inable to be edited unless the document was copied by the Army CID.
Internally to MP, once we submit the receipt we no longer have access to track the proceedings that it is used in, as those are handled by the Army CID.
The original copy I uploaded to the Army CID was uneditable and only I maintained access, so it would be inable to be edited unless the document was copied by the Army CID.
NickValdev 2025-10-31 09:33 a.m.
When I uploaded the document, I proofread it several times and it was accurate at that time.
NickValdevWhen I uploaded the document, I proofread it several times and it was accurate at that time.
adriann 2025-10-31 09:41 a.m.
Is there anything in this document that you believe today is incorrect or inaccurate?
NickValdev 2025-10-31 09:41 a.m.
No.
adriann 2025-10-31 09:45 a.m.@NickValdev To the best of your knowledge, is everything contained within Exhibit C true and correct?
NickValdev 2025-10-31 09:45 a.m.
Yes.
adriann 2025-10-31 09:53 a.m.
I’d now like to direct your attention to the State's Disclosure A
adriann 2025-10-31 09:55 a.m.@NickValdev after the events of August 29 2025, did you participate in an interview with Lieutenant Colonel jyyvznn of the Army Criminal Investigation Division?
NickValdev 2025-10-31 09:55 a.m.
Yes.
adriann 2025-10-31 09:57 a.m.@NickValdev Do you recognize this transcript? https://image2url.com/images/1760585935597-f16d77e2-ed11-455e-a01f-13245190f0c5.png 
NickValdev 2025-10-31 09:58 a.m.
Yes.
adriann 2025-10-31 09:59 a.m.@NickValdev Was this interview conducted in the normal course of the investigation into the incident that occurred that day?
NickValdev 2025-10-31 10:00 a.m.
That would be a question for Army CID. I cannot speak for the "normal course" of Army CID investigations.
adriann 2025-10-31 10:02 a.m.@NickValdev At the time of the interview, did you provide those statements accurately based on your own firsthand knowledge of what happened?
NickValdev 2025-10-31 10:02 a.m.
Yes.
adriann 2025-10-31 10:05 a.m.@NickValdev Does the State's Disclosure A accurately reflect the statements you made in that interview?
NickValdev 2025-10-31 10:05 a.m.
Yes.
adriann 2025-10-31 10:07 a.m.@Brenda Your honour at this time the State moves to admit Disclosure A into evidence.
Brenda 2025-10-31 10:28 a.m.@Toby
NickValdevI have not. Internally to MP, once we submit the receipt we no longer have access to track the proceedings that it is used in, as those are handled by the Army CID. The original...
Toby 2025-10-31 10:30 a.m.
Objection to the second half as non responsive
Brenda 2025-10-31 10:31 a.m.
Sustained
Brenda 2025-10-31 10:31 a.m.
Everything after "I have not. " is struck from the record
BrendaToby 2025-10-31 10:33 a.m.
We object as the true authenticity cannot be provided. I don't know who took this screenshot or if these are the real people involved
Toby 2025-10-31 10:33 a.m.
The state should've given the full transcript
Toby 2025-10-31 10:33 a.m.
Not just a screenshot
Brenda 2025-11-01 01:51 a.m.
Overruled
Brenda 2025-11-01 01:52 a.m.
Disclosure A is admitted into evidence @Toby @adriann @NickValdev
adriann 2025-11-01 02:08 a.m.@NickValdev Were the statements during that interview made while the details of the incident were still fresh in your memory?
adriannNickValdev 2025-11-01 02:19 a.m.
Yes.
adriann 2025-11-01 02:21 a.m.@NickValdev In that interview were you describing the same sequence of events previously reviewed in Exhibit B?
NickValdev 2025-11-01 02:22 a.m.
Yes.
adriann 2025-11-01 02:26 a.m.@NickValdev At the time of that interview, were you under any instruction or influence to alter the facts?
NickValdev 2025-11-01 02:28 a.m.
No.
adriann 2025-11-01 02:30 a.m.@NickValdev Were you motivated by anything other than accurately reporting what happened during your duties?
NickValdev 2025-11-01 02:30 a.m.
No
adriann 2025-11-01 02:46 a.m.@Brenda Your honour the state has no further questions for the witness at this time.
Brenda 2025-11-01 02:55 a.m.@Toby
Toby 2025-11-01 04:42 p.m.@NickValdev Hello
Toby 2025-11-01 04:42 p.m.
how long have you been a member of the MNG Military Police
NickValdev 2025-11-01 04:47 p.m.
I'm unsure. A decent amount of time is the best answer I can provide at the moment.
Toby 2025-11-01 05:21 p.m.@NickValdev What is the procedure when a particular group is deemed a threat to Fort Standish and its personnel
TobyNickValdev 2025-11-01 05:43 p.m.
Procedures vary by how severe the threat is
NickValdevProcedures vary by how severe the threat is
Toby 2025-11-01 05:43 p.m.
Can you elaborate please
TobyCan you elaborate please
NickValdev 2025-11-01 05:54 p.m.
Not really. Youll need to be more specific with your question.
NickValdev 2025-11-01 05:54 p.m.
It varies
Toby 2025-11-01 05:54 p.m.
Please explain how it varies depending on the level of the threat
NickValdev 2025-11-01 05:55 p.m.
higher threats get a different response than a low threat
Toby 2025-11-01 05:55 p.m.
How do high threats get responded to? in terms of procedures
NickValdev 2025-11-01 05:55 p.m.
define high threat
NickValdev 2025-11-01 05:55 p.m.
threat to life?
NickValdev 2025-11-01 05:55 p.m.
lethal force
Toby 2025-11-01 05:55 p.m.
A high threat to Fort Standish as a whole
Toby 2025-11-01 05:56 p.m.
and its personnel
NickValdev 2025-11-01 05:57 p.m.
a threat to installation security which may risk loss of the installation as a whole would warrant deadly force unless another response which preserves lives is possible. the procedure would be to eliminate the threats and operate in accordance with the orders from the online ranking official
Toby 2025-11-01 05:58 p.m.
And do these threats that pose a high risk/threat, still pose a risk to those who are out with the Fort Standish permitter fence?
NickValdev 2025-11-01 05:59 p.m.
what is this question asking
NickValdev 2025-11-01 05:59 p.m.
that made no sense to me
Toby 2025-11-01 06:00 p.m.
To those who are outside of the permitter fence, are they themselves at risk to these high risk threats?(edited)
NickValdev 2025-11-01 06:02 p.m.
any individual in the immediate proximity of the fort standish area could be at risk of harm during a threat to the installation
Toby 2025-11-01 06:02 p.m.
Is it common for these threats to loiter in the area surrounding the Fort?
NickValdev 2025-11-01 06:05 p.m.
it may be common for them to loiter around but typically they are not a threat whilst loitering and are only considered a threat once they do something to attack/threaten the installation or personnel
NickValdev 2025-11-01 06:05 p.m.
alright i have to go to work
NickValdev 2025-11-01 06:05 p.m.
i will be gone for 5 hours
Toby 2025-11-01 07:18 p.m.
Ok ping me when you're home
Tobyadriann 2025-11-01 08:22 p.m.
Objection relevance as this hypothetical situation of "when a group is deemed a threat” is not tied to this incident or defendant.
adriannObjection relevance as this hypothetical situation of "when a group is deemed a threat” is not tied to this incident or defendant.
Toby 2025-11-01 08:24 p.m.
Its going to become relevant when I get to ask him follow up questions
adriann 2025-11-01 08:26 p.m.
Not about the August 29 incident or the defendant and you're asking for general threat policy
TobyPlease explain how it varies depending on the level of the threat
adriann 2025-11-01 08:27 p.m.
Objection vague and speculative as there is no specific incident or threat identified and this question asks for hypotheticals.
adriannObjection vague and speculative as there is no specific incident or threat identified and this question asks for hypotheticals.
Toby 2025-11-01 08:28 p.m.
How is it speculative, as an MP he is able to talk about the procedures regarding threats to the fort
Toby 2025-11-01 08:29 p.m.
Plus vague doesn't work since it was clarified afterwards
TobyHow do high threats get responded to? in terms of procedures
adriann 2025-11-01 08:34 p.m.
Objection Relevance as this seeks tactical protocol info unrelated to defendant’s conduct
TobyTo those who are outside of the permitter fence, are they themselves at risk to these high risk threats?(edited)
adriann 2025-11-01 08:35 p.m.
Objection speculation, continues the same vague hypothetical and asks witness to guess risk levels
TobyIs it common for these threats to loiter in the area surrounding the Fort?
adriann 2025-11-01 08:37 p.m.
Objection lack of foundation, the witness has not established that he personally monitors or analyzes “threats” around Fort Standish beyond this incident(edited)
adriann 2025-11-01 08:37 p.m.
No established basis of knowledge to speak about what’s “common”
TobyPlus vague doesn't work since it was clarified afterwards
adriann 2025-11-01 08:40 p.m.
You didnt define it, you just restated it as "a high threat to fort standish as a whole" without defining "high threat"
TobyHow is it speculative, as an MP he is able to talk about the procedures regarding threats to the fort
adriann 2025-11-01 08:48 p.m.
also witness is not testifying as an expert
adriann 2025-11-01 08:49 p.m.
he is a lay witness
adriannObjection Relevance as this seeks tactical protocol info unrelated to defendant’s conduct
Toby 2025-11-01 09:04 p.m.
Untrue, it will become relevant once I ask more questions
adriannObjection speculation, continues the same vague hypothetical and asks witness to guess risk levels
Toby 2025-11-01 09:05 p.m.
No, hes an MP he can speak to security protocols and procedures
adriannObjection lack of foundation, the witness has not established that he personally monitors or analyzes “threats” around Fort Standish beyond this incident(edited)
Toby 2025-11-01 09:05 p.m.
That's a silly objection
adriannYou didnt define it, you just restated it as "a high threat to fort standish as a whole" without defining "high threat"
Toby 2025-11-01 09:05 p.m.
Wrong
adriannalso witness is not testifying as an expert
Toby 2025-11-01 09:05 p.m.
He isnt testifying as an expert witness
Toby 2025-11-01 09:06 p.m.
A lay witness as an MP can still speak to things within his experience
Toby 2025-11-01 09:06 p.m.
Such as security protocols, it's no different to you asking him the procedures of arresting somebody
TobyA lay witness as an MP can still speak to things within his experience
adriann 2025-11-01 09:08 p.m.
Toby 2025-11-01 09:10 p.m.
Can you stop cross talking please
adriann 2025-11-01 09:10 p.m.
Your honour may I request that the record reflect that opposing counsel is speaking out of turn and interrupting the examination?(edited)
Toby 2025-11-01 09:10 p.m.
We've laid out our arguments
Toby 2025-11-01 09:10 p.m.
Let the judge rule
adriannYour honour may I request that the record reflect that opposing counsel is speaking out of turn and interrupting the examination?(edited)
Toby 2025-11-01 09:11 p.m.
?????
Toby 2025-11-01 09:11 p.m.
You interrupted my examination by objecting, what are you on about(edited)
Toby 2025-11-01 09:12 p.m.
Im going to sleep
Toby 2025-11-01 09:12 p.m.
Will check tomorrow
adriann 2025-11-01 09:27 p.m.
Your honour I would like to ask that all argument be directed to the Court and not to counsel. The defense has been arguing with the prosecution instead of addressing the court, as well as speaking and using argumentative responses during objections from the state before rulings
Brenda 2025-11-02 03:40 a.m.
All the objections are overruled
Brenda 2025-11-02 03:40 a.m.
Continue @adriann @Toby @NickValdev
NickValdevit may be common for them to loiter around but typically they are not a threat whilst loitering and are only considered a threat once they do something to attack/threaten the insta...
Toby 2025-11-02 02:26 p.m.
Are you aware of a group called the MRF
NickValdev 2025-11-02 02:30 p.m.
yes
TobyAre you aware of a group called the MRF
adriann 2025-11-02 06:06 p.m.
Objection relevance
Toby 2025-11-03 01:07 a.m.
It'll become relevant if im allowed to ask my questions
Brenda 2025-11-03 03:32 a.m.
Overruled
NickValdevyes
Toby 2025-11-03 07:01 p.m.
Are they a persistent threat to FS?
TobyAre they a persistent threat to FS?
NickValdev 2025-11-04 12:25 a.m.
I would have no clue. I've scaled back my activity and even when I was active I didn't dedicate a whole lot of effort to identifying WHO was attacking me/the installation.
NickValdevI would have no clue. I've scaled back my activity and even when I was active I didn't dedicate a whole lot of effort to identifying WHO was attacking me/the installation.
Toby 2025-11-04 11:47 a.m.
Are you aware of who they are?
NickValdev 2025-11-04 12:04 p.m.
no i do not know the names and identities mrf members
NickValdevno i do not know the names and identities mrf members
Toby 2025-11-04 12:05 p.m.
No not the individual members, do you know the existence of such a group called MRF
TobyAre you aware of a group called the MRF
NickValdev 2025-11-04 12:05 p.m.
as previously stated, yes
NickValdevas previously stated, yes
Toby 2025-11-04 12:20 p.m.
Do you know what they are, in terms of what their purpose is
TobyDo you know what they are, in terms of what their purpose is
NickValdev 2025-11-04 12:54 p.m.
No.
TobyNo not the individual members, do you know the existence of such a group called MRF
adriann 2025-11-04 08:58 p.m.
Objection ask and answered
TobyAre you aware of a group called the MRF
adriann 2025-11-04 08:59 p.m.
^^
Brenda 2025-11-04 09:35 p.m.
Sustained
Toby 2025-11-05 02:35 p.m.@NickValdev for how long were you on duty that day before the incident in question took place
NickValdev 2025-11-05 02:45 p.m.
I cannot recall that number
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-05 05:39 p.m. @Brenda has added @orange to the case channel.
Case Modified
Toby 2025-11-05 05:42 p.m.@orange who are you appearing for?
Toby 2025-11-05 05:44 p.m.
Because I've not been told anything, and nor has my client, but your NOA says youre appearing for the defendant?
orange 2025-11-05 05:44 p.m.
What do you think n igga
Toby 2025-11-05 05:44 p.m.
Slightly confused
orange 2025-11-05 05:44 p.m.
It says defendant
Toby 2025-11-05 05:44 p.m.
Then why is my client saying he doesn't know why youre appearing
orange 2025-11-05 05:44 p.m.
You’re lying
orange 2025-11-05 05:45 p.m.
Under oath
orange 2025-11-05 05:45 p.m.
Motion for sanctions @Brenda
Toby 2025-11-05 05:45 p.m.
???
Toby 2025-11-05 05:45 p.m.
Ok bud
Toby 2025-11-05 05:45 p.m.
The governor apparently defending a case who the branch he leads is prosecuting
orangeUnder oath
Toby 2025-11-05 05:45 p.m.
Also im not under oath
orange 2025-11-05 05:45 p.m.
Ok let’s get this started
orange 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.@NickValdev Witness is dismissed you may return to your seat
orange 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
Defense calls
orange 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
Ummm
Toby 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
Buddy
Toby 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
Nk
Toby 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
No
Toby 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
You were only added
Toby 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
That doesn't mean you take over
orange 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
Sorry im taking over
orange 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
I outrank you
Toby 2025-11-05 05:46 p.m.
Says who(edited)
orange 2025-11-05 05:47 p.m.@adriann My client did commit what you’re alleging and were now seeking a plea deal
orange 2025-11-05 05:47 p.m.
Contact me
Toby 2025-11-05 05:47 p.m.
orange 2025-11-05 05:47 p.m.
I’ve accepted your friend request
Toby 2025-11-05 05:47 p.m.
Are we fr rn
TobySays who(edited)
orange 2025-11-05 05:47 p.m.
Editing messages @Brenda
Toby 2025-11-05 05:47 p.m.@Brenda help
orange 2025-11-05 05:47 p.m.
Motion for sanctions against
orange 2025-11-05 05:47 p.m.
Toby
Toby 2025-11-05 05:48 p.m.
I motion for sanctions against orange for thinking he outranks me
Toby 2025-11-05 05:52 p.m. 
Toby 2025-11-05 05:52 p.m.@Brenda
Toby 2025-11-05 05:52 p.m.@orange you're fired
Toby 2025-11-05 05:52 p.m.
Good night
Toby 2025-11-05 06:05 p.m.@Brenda I withdraw as counsel.
UserMessage could not be loaded.
orange 2025-11-05 06:06 p.m.
orange 2025-11-05 06:06 p.m.
Wrong “sis,” you are fired.
orange 2025-11-05 06:06 p.m.@adriann Were doing a plea agreement
orange 2025-11-05 06:06 p.m.
Dm me
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-11-05 06:26 p.m.
Interesting
orange 2025-11-05 09:04 p.m.
Defendant would like to change his plea @Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-06 06:08 a.m.@alex Are you changing your plea?
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-06 07:23 a.m. @Brenda has added @alex to the case channel.
Case Modified
BrendaBrenda 2025-11-06 07:23 a.m.@alex
alex 2025-11-06 07:24 a.m.
I plea guilty on all counts
alex 2025-11-06 07:24 a.m.@Brenda
Brenda 2025-11-06 07:32 a.m.@alex I am going to remind you of your rights again:
If you do not understand them, you should ask the Court to explain it in a way you can understand.
You have been brought here on two misdemeanor offences and also two felony offenses, the most serious criminal offenses one can be charged with in the State. You have been given a copy of the document that formally charges you of such offenses (the criminal information) and a document outlining the facts, attested and sworn to be truthful by a police officer, which lead to you being charged with such offenses (this is called an affidavit).
The felony charges against you qualify as "high-risk offender" charges andwill have a severe impact on your future prospects in the community. It may impact your ability to maintain your current employment, any future employment, or whatever restrictions state law imposes on you as a consequence of your criminal conviction. You are required to register with the Mayflower Department of Justice as a high-risk offender if you are convicted of such offences by this court. You can only be convicted after a fair trial, or if you plead guilty to those offenses.
With all this in mind, please inform the court that you have understood your rights by saying:
1. You have the right to remain silent. You do not have to speak or provide any information that could incriminate you.
2. You have the right to an attorney present during any questioning or legal proceedings. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at no cost.
3. You have the right to a fair and public trial where evidence will be presented, and witnesses can be called to testify on your behalf.
4. You have the right to confront witnesses against you and test their evidence. You can question them in court.
If you do not understand them, you should ask the Court to explain it in a way you can understand.
You have been brought here on two misdemeanor offences and also two felony offenses, the most serious criminal offenses one can be charged with in the State. You have been given a copy of the document that formally charges you of such offenses (the criminal information) and a document outlining the facts, attested and sworn to be truthful by a police officer, which lead to you being charged with such offenses (this is called an affidavit).
The felony charges against you qualify as "high-risk offender" charges and
With all this in mind, please inform the court that you have understood your rights by saying:
I understand my rights as they were read to me.BrendaBrenda 2025-11-06 07:37 a.m.
I am also advising you that under 4 MSC 5 § 1601(d), your ability to act in the capacity of a peace officer in the State of Mayflower will be immediately suspended for 50 days if you are found or plead guilty.
You alsorisk having your LETI certificate permanently revoked if you are found or plead guilty (at the discretion of the LETI). If you hold a bar certificate or any other government status, or if you are publicly employed, you risk disciplinary action if you are found or plead guilty.
@alex (edited)
You also
Brendaalex 2025-11-06 12:33 p.m.
I understand my rights as they were read to me.
alex 2025-11-06 12:34 p.m.
I plead guilty on all counts
alex 2025-11-06 12:41 p.m.@Brenda Can this be dealt with today
alex 2025-11-06 04:33 p.m.@Brenda Can this be dealt with today
adriann 2025-11-06 04:38 p.m.
Your honour the parties have reached a plea agreement in this matter
adriannYour honour the parties have reached a plea agreement in this matter
Brenda 2025-11-06 04:40 p.m.
Send the terms here
adriann 2025-11-06 04:41 p.m.
The defendant will plead guilty to all charges listed in the information in exchange for a recommended reduced sentence by the state of 70 minutes to be served in the county jail
Brenda 2025-11-06 04:41 p.m.
I'll accept that
Brenda 2025-11-06 04:50 p.m.
Order will be entered
Brenda 2025-11-06 05:32 p.m.
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant is hereby ADJUDICATED GUILTY on 1 count of Evasion in violation of 1 MSC § 1307, 1 count of Failure to Comply in violation of 1 MSC § 1305, 1 count of Hit and Run in violation of 1 MSC § 2306, and 1 count of Gross Misconduct in violation of 1 MSC § 1303 and is hereby SENTENCED to seventy (70) minutes in jail. @alex @adriann @orange
224.58 KB
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-06 05:33 p.m. @Brenda has added @melly to the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-11-06 05:33 p.m.@melly I'm ordering you to suspend Nukhz' LETI certificate for 50 days under 4 MSC 5 § 1601(d)
Brenda 2025-11-06 05:33 p.m.
have this done within 48 hours
orange 2025-11-06 05:34 p.m.
Thank you for your time your honor
BrendaJUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED that Defendant is hereby ADJUDICATED GUILTY on 1 count of Evasion in violation of 1 MSC § 1307, 1 count of Failure to Comply in violation of 1 MSC §...
Brenda 2025-11-06 05:34 p.m.@gurt maybe Enter this in-game on my behalf. Thanks
orangeThank you for your time your honor
alex 2025-11-06 05:34 p.m.
Execute plan 55
alex 2025-11-06 05:34 p.m.
orange 2025-11-06 05:34 p.m.
Brenda 2025-11-06 05:41 p.m.
In light of the pardon, the sentence is vacated. The remainder of the judgment will remain in effect. Case dismissed w/ prejudice @alex @adriann @orange
orange 2025-11-06 05:42 p.m.
Thank you your honor
alex 2025-11-06 05:48 p.m.
BrendaBrenda 2025-11-07 05:13 p.m.@melly Confirm this is done so I can close this case
melly 2025-11-08 05:30 p.m.
it's done
alex 2025-11-08 05:34 p.m.
alex 2025-11-08 05:34 p.m.@orange
orange 2025-11-08 05:35 p.m.
Don’t worry.
orange 2025-11-08 05:35 p.m.
Daddy will save you.
Brenda 2025-11-09 04:28 p.m.@Prothonotary's Office Ready for archive
adriann used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-11 01:15 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-11 01:15 a.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1437687249947852852 Successfully created transcript.
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-11 01:16 a.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Volume XIIIBrenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-18 08:00 a.m. @Brenda has added @melly to the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-11-18 08:01 a.m.@melly The stay issued by the Supreme Court has expired . I am therefore re-ordering you to suspend Nukhz' license for 50 days
Brenda 2025-11-18 08:01 a.m. 
Brenda 2025-11-18 08:01 a.m.
After review I have noticed that it is still marked "Certified" on the Trello
BrendaBrenda 2025-11-18 08:01 a.m.
Have this done within 24 hours
Brenda 2025-11-18 08:04 a.m.
Brenda 2025-11-18 08:04 a.m. 
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-18 08:26 a.m. @Brenda has added @alex to the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-11-18 08:26 a.m.@alex As the stay has expired, your LETI certificate is again suspended for 50 days
Brenda 2025-11-18 08:27 a.m.
I'm enjoining and restraining you from acting in any peace officer capacity during this court-ordered suspension pursuant to 4 MSC 5 § 1601(d)
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-18 08:33 a.m. @Brenda has added @wall-e to the case channel.
Case Modified
BrendaBrenda 2025-11-18 08:34 a.m.@wall-e I'm ordering you to immediately and within 24 hours discharge Nukhz from the Mayflower State Police(edited)
Brenda 2025-11-18 08:34 a.m.
his LETI certificate is suspended for 50 days pursuant to 4 MSC 5 § 1601(d)
Brenda
wall-e 2025-11-18 08:41 a.m.1
Understood Your Honor, I will notify my command staff immediately and update you when it’s done. Thank you for the quick notification!
1wall-e Server2025-11-18 08:44 a.m.
Brendawall-e 2025-11-19 08:59 a.m.
Good morning Judge,
Nukhz remains on administrative leave while my Internal Affairs Commander and Administration Bureau Captain finish his due process and paperwork processing.
I hope it’s okay that his discharge will be processed later today while he remains on administrative leave.
Thank you!
Nukhz remains on administrative leave while my Internal Affairs Commander and Administration Bureau Captain finish his due process and paperwork processing.
I hope it’s okay that his discharge will be processed later today while he remains on administrative leave.
Thank you!
wall-eGood morning Judge, Nukhz remains on administrative leave while my Internal Affairs Commander and Administration Bureau Captain finish his due process and paperwork processing. ...
Brenda 2025-11-19 09:03 a.m.
Well there's no due process to be made as he's not being disciplined, but rather discharged via a court order as a result of LETI suspension
Brenda 2025-11-19 09:03 a.m.
I'll give you 24 hours from now to complete the paperwork
BrendaI'll give you 24 hours from now to complete the paperwork
wall-e 2025-11-19 09:28 a.m.
Understood Your Honor, thank you very much.
alex 2025-11-19 10:17 a.m.
alex 2025-11-19 10:18 a.m.@orange I miss you Everyday. Its like ur still here.
BrendaBrenda 2025-11-19 01:59 p.m.@melly Have you complied?
Brenda 2025-11-19 01:59 p.m.
He needs to be deroled in the Roblox group
Brenda 2025-11-19 01:59 p.m. 
Brenda 2025-11-19 01:59 p.m.
needs to be changed to Suspended
melly 2025-11-19 02:23 p.m.
i was working at my j*b
melly 2025-11-19 02:23 p.m.
ill do it later
mellyi was working at my j*b
alex 2025-11-19 04:49 p.m.
Dude dont say that ladyboy judge is going to having a fucking aneurysm
alex 2025-11-19 04:52 p.m.
alex 2025-11-19 04:52 p.m.@poontang look at us.
alex 2025-11-19 04:52 p.m.
Memories.
alex 2025-11-19 04:52 p.m.
Me and @Anakin
alex 2025-11-19 04:53 p.m.@CookieMonster I miss you
alex 2025-11-19 04:57 p.m.
cc: @bladevaz @bopmite @hayden @ollie. @poontang @sixela @Key
Please see above.
Please see above.
alex 2025-11-19 04:57 p.m.
cc: @mrntee @MarchelloKY @SECTION @MORONICNINCOMPOOP3.0 @ch0k @Epic @sanchez @mari
Please see above.
Please see above.
alex 2025-11-19 04:57 p.m.
cc: @DavidDRedwood @GotR_oot @zzz @dan @Doctor Anas Researcher @tom
Please see above.
Please see above.
alex 2025-11-19 04:58 p.m.
alex 2025-11-19 04:58 p.m.@AlbertBlackwell And you.
alex 2025-11-19 05:00 p.m.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1144653772530913280/1175043415063396384/20231117_135236.gif
alex 2025-11-19 05:02 p.m.
alex Server2025-11-19 05:06 p.m.
alex Server2025-11-19 05:19 p.m.
wall-e Server2025-11-20 06:07 a.m.
wall-e 2025-11-20 06:08 a.m.1
Good morning, Your Honor. Thank you again for the extension. His case report has been completed and his employment with the State Police has been terminated.
Thank you.@Brenda
Thank you.
1Brenda 2025-11-20 10:01 p.m.@melly Confirm that Nukhz has been suspended and deroled in the Roblox group
melly 2025-11-21 01:14 a.m. 
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-22 05:30 p.m. @Brenda has added @alex to the case channel.
Case Modified
BrendaI'm enjoining and restraining you from acting in any peace officer capacity during this court-ordered suspension pursuant to 4 MSC 5 § 1601(d)
Brenda 2025-11-22 05:31 p.m.@alex You're ordered to show cause within 24 hours why I should not hold you in contempt under Titles 1 and 5 for violating the court order prohibiting you from acting as a peace officer for 50 days
Brenda 2025-11-22 05:31 p.m.
If you are found in contempt, I will be permanently revoking your LETI and imprisoning you for 1 month
alex 2025-11-22 05:31 p.m.
What r u on about
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-22 05:31 p.m. @Brenda has added @wall-e to the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m.@wall-e Remove Nukhz from the MSP roblox group. You are ordered to do this within 24 hours, and show cause why he has not been deroled in the group
alex 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m.
How is that my fault
alex 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m.
Im not the msp admin Bitch
alexHow is that my fault
Brenda 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m. 
Brenda 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m.
Try again
alex 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m.
that is the militia
alex 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m.
a private organisation
Brenda 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m.
With handcuffs
alex 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m.
Please get it right next time
alex 2025-11-22 05:32 p.m.
Yes it has security
Brenda 2025-11-22 05:33 p.m.
Interesting
alex 2025-11-22 05:33 p.m.
fuckass Retard
alex 2025-11-22 05:33 p.m.
Also dispense logs arent usable for anything like this 
Brenda 2025-11-22 05:33 p.m.
The courts transcend Roleplay limitations, simply
BrendaThe courts transcend Roleplay limitations, simply
alex 2025-11-22 05:34 p.m.
Yeah dude dispense logs is for moderation
alex 2025-11-22 05:34 p.m.
Not roleplay
alex 2025-11-22 05:34 p.m.
Oops wrong gif
alex 2025-11-22 05:34 p.m.
my Bad
alex 2025-11-22 05:34 p.m.
alex 2025-11-22 05:34 p.m.@krabz ummmmmmmmmmmm
alex 2025-11-22 05:34 p.m.
Help
alex 2025-11-22 05:35 p.m.
I think this ladyboy judge is overstepping and about to get Dicked down by my Dawgs
alex 2025-11-22 05:35 p.m.
Hi @wall-e 
alex 2025-11-22 05:36 p.m.
I miss you
alex 2025-11-22 05:36 p.m.
alex 2025-11-22 05:36 p.m.@meowiitten Help Required!
alex 2025-11-22 05:37 p.m.
Dude why arent you saying hi back @wall-e
alex 2025-11-22 05:37 p.m.
I see how it is
alex 2025-11-22 05:37 p.m.
Brendawall-e 2025-11-22 05:39 p.m.1
I just exiled him Your Honor, terribly sorry.
He had been processed via the bot and removed from our repository however I had overlooked removing him from the group after coordinating the removal with my Internal Affairs Commander after our Administration Bureau Captain hadn’t been able to process it himself.
Apologies for the delay and I recognize the severity of this administrative oversight. Rest assured that Nukhz remains terminated as per your previous order and all our records will continue to reflect this.
Thank you, Judge.
He had been processed via the bot and removed from our repository however I had overlooked removing him from the group after coordinating the removal with my Internal Affairs Commander after our Administration Bureau Captain hadn’t been able to process it himself.
Apologies for the delay and I recognize the severity of this administrative oversight. Rest assured that Nukhz remains terminated as per your previous order and all our records will continue to reflect this.
Thank you, Judge.
1alex 2025-11-22 05:39 p.m.
How dare you do that Xero
alex 2025-11-22 05:39 p.m.
Not on mate.
alex 2025-11-22 05:39 p.m.
Not on at all.
BrendaClick to see attachment.
wall-e 2025-11-22 05:39 p.m.
But I can say this is not our equipment if it helps, Judge.
alex 2025-11-22 05:39 p.m.@AlbertBlackwell Thoughts Please
alex 2025-11-22 05:40 p.m.@DauuX Thoughts Please
alex 2025-11-22 05:40 p.m.@T4K3N Thoughts Please
alex 2025-11-22 05:40 p.m.NCSの再生数トップ50位までのメドレーです！どれもかっこいい曲ばかりで、3時間もあるので作業用にでも使ってください！2022年最新！
★この動画の再生リスト↓
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SbtVN3XbIQ&list=PLLSuvpeFzawwAzeYenPhgIF3BN_u7G1m2
★メインチャンネル★
https://www... 
★この動画の再生リスト↓
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SbtVN3XbIQ&list=PLLSuvpeFzawwAzeYenPhgIF3BN_u7G1m2
★メインチャンネル★
https://www...
Brenda used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-22 05:40 p.m. @Brenda has removed @alex from the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda used /add
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-28 07:24 p.m. @Brenda has added @alex to the case channel.
Case Modified
alex 2025-11-30 02:30 p.m.@Sheriff of Clark County Hello I require your Assistance.
alex 2025-11-30 02:30 p.m.
I need YOU specifically
alex 2025-11-30 02:34 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:34 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1099549575720751214/1100243969490813009/jAxf6dD_-_Imgur.gif
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1144653772530913280/1175043415063396384/20231117_135236.gif
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:35 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:36 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:36 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:36 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:36 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:36 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:36 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:36 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:36 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:37 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:37 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:37 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:37 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:37 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:37 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:37 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:37 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:37 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:38 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:38 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:38 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:38 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:38 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:38 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:38 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:39 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:40 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:40 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:41 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 02:45 p.m.
This is what you make me do you stupid Ladyboy @singhski @tom @hayden @ollie. @Key @dan @wall-e @Doctor Anas Researcher @pokle @meowiitten
alex 2025-11-30 02:48 p.m.@Anakin @bladevaz @Nublets @orange @Erik @CookieMonster @mrntee @steva @StevenArnott @Dawg Hi
alex 2025-11-30 02:48 p.m.@૮ 6dcry ྀིა I need you
alex 2025-11-30 02:48 p.m.@Requires Court-Appointed Therapist
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:03 p.m.@alex I'm sanctioning you $100,000.00 for flooding this channel payable to either @krm or @cabot within 3 days
alex 2025-11-30 03:03 p.m.
Sorry I have no case anymore im not Paying
alex 2025-11-30 03:03 p.m.
not my fault u didnt archieve it ladyboy
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:03 p.m.
Ok, then your LETI will be suspended for an additional 50 days
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:03 p.m.
I'll check back in 3 days
alex 2025-11-30 03:03 p.m.
I want my lawyer @meowiitten added please
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
Unfortunately you're not entitled to a lawyer
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
This is direct contemptous conduct
BrendaI'll check back in 3 days
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
*
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
Ok well there is no court case here anymore
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
You are to refrain from sending further messages here unless it is to confirm you have paid
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:04 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.
alex 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.
Brenda used /remove
clerkFlow Bot2025-11-30 03:05 p.m. @Brenda has removed @alex from the case channel.
Case Modified
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.@gurt maybe Jail Nukhz for 14 days in-game
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.
Civil contempt
Brenda 2025-11-30 03:05 p.m.
God bless.
judicialFLOW Bot2025-11-30 04:10 p.m.Requester: @meowiitten
Party:Nukhz
Channel:state-of-mayflower-v-nukhz
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. Request ID: 938ee14b9b9f409da674eef145ebac00 Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
judicialFLOW Bot2025-11-30 04:10 p.m.Requester: @meowiitten
Party:Nukhz
Channel:state-of-mayflower-v-nukhz
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. Request ID: 1879515e9d1e407d8a6e150f2e239130 Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
judicialFLOW Bot2025-11-30 04:26 p.m.Requester: @CharlesLXV
Party:Defense
Channel:state-of-mayflower-v-nukhz
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. Request ID: 9aca19a52ad14992aacbed9fe51b678c Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
judicialFLOW Bot2025-12-02 01:32 p.m.Requester: @singhski
Party:Defendant
Channel:state-of-mayflower-v-nukhz
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below. Request ID: 3bdb7b7761bd46ea80c34eb360e55882 Approve Deny
(edited)
Appearance Request
Party:
Channel:
A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
Kezzera 2025-12-02 01:42 p.m.
(contemnor requested access to communicate with court for purging contempt)
Kezzera 2025-12-02 01:42 p.m.
(added)
alex 2025-12-02 01:42 p.m.
I will be on my Best Behaviour
alex 2025-12-02 01:42 p.m.@Brenda I have Decided to Pay after taking out a Loan
alex 2025-12-02 01:42 p.m.@krm @cabot Helloooo
alex 2025-12-02 01:46 p.m.
alexBrenda 2025-12-02 01:59 p.m.
Ok
Brenda 2025-12-02 01:59 p.m.@krm collect money from nuhz
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-02 02:00 p.m.
+wHEN CAN YOU PAY. @alex
alex 2025-12-02 02:02 p.m.
Like
alex 2025-12-02 02:02 p.m.
hour
alex 2025-12-02 02:18 p.m.@krm Hi
alex 2025-12-02 02:18 p.m.
Me can do Now
alex 2025-12-02 02:53 p.m.@krm Helloooo
alex 2025-12-02 02:53 p.m.
I got bummed in prison by a MBI agent
alex 2025-12-02 02:53 p.m.
Can I get half off
alex 2025-12-02 03:16 p.m.
Look what they're making me do as a prisoner
alex 2025-12-02 03:16 p.m.@meowiitten I know how you feel when you got gaped in prison
alex 2025-12-02 03:21 p.m.@krm Helloooo
Richostein 2025-12-02 03:48 p.m.
Richostein will be randomly
alex 2025-12-02 03:48 p.m.
I want the 100k
alex 2025-12-04 11:28 a.m.@Brenda @krm @cabot WHY AM I BACK IN PRISON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
alex 2025-12-04 11:33 a.m.
HELP!!!!
alex 2025-12-04 11:33 a.m.@meowiitten I need Assistance.
alexshah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-04 11:40 a.m.
No
alex 2025-12-04 11:40 a.m.
TF U MEAN NO
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-04 11:40 a.m.
U not in prison
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-04 11:40 a.m.
U lie
alex 2025-12-04 11:40 a.m.
Dude I got kidnapped
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-04 11:40 a.m.
U
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-04 11:40 a.m.
Lolololol
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-04 11:40 a.m.
JHhahahha
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-04 11:40 a.m.
Kjajajja
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-04 11:41 a.m.
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-04 11:43 a.m.@alex Try rejoing
alex 2025-12-04 11:43 a.m.
im bumming people in mersea Rn
alex 2025-12-04 11:43 a.m.@mantisshrimp69 Got bummed
alex 2025-12-19 11:45 a.m.@krm Thinking of u
profile 2025-12-21 06:47 p.m.
Presiding in this docket is now MandatoryMorale, chamber-information
alex 2025-12-21 07:23 p.m.
Heyy @morale Can I have my Leti back yet
alex 2025-12-21 07:41 p.m.
I was a Victim of FRAUD
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-22 11:27 a.m.
Hello @alex
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-22 11:27 a.m.chamber-information
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ 2025-12-22 11:28 a.m.
Hon'ble Justice Morale will reply to your request within 365 working days. I will have to recuse.
alex 2025-12-22 11:31 a.m.
These wait times are caused by all the illegal immigrants
alexHeyy @morale Can I have my Leti back yet
morale 2025-12-22 06:07 p.m.
I consider the sentence discharged and will allow full reinstatement of all rights and priviledges so indemned by the Court through the process of these proceedings
morale 2025-12-22 06:08 p.m.
The clerk will enter such a judgement into the record @profile
moraleI consider the sentence discharged and will allow full reinstatement of all rights and priviledges so indemned by the Court through the process of these proceedings
alex 2025-12-22 06:08 p.m.@melly HI!!!
alex 2025-12-22 06:08 p.m.
LETI BACK PLEASE
𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥ 2025-12-22 09:53 p.m.
# State of Mayflower v. Nukhz
## Order Discharging Defendant
### [CR-163-25](https://trello.com/c/KGUlhT42)
Upon review of the proceedings, Defendant Nukhz is discharged from their sentence and shall re-gain all rights and privileges stripped directly or indirectly by the Court throughout the course of these proceedings, including but not limited to the reinstatement of Nukhz's certification with the Mayflower Law Enforcement Training Institute as it relates to the above-captioned matter.
The Clerk of the Court or their designee is directed to serve a copy of this judgment upon the Director of the Mayflower Law Enforcement Training Institute within three working days.
**ISSUED BY ORDER OF THE COURT**
**Dec. 22, 2025**
/s/
-# *mandatorymorale, P.C., O.M., Associate Justice (sitting in designation)*𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥ 2025-12-22 09:53 p.m.@morale good? you can just sign it and put in /ruling if you want
alexLETI BACK PLEASE
melly 2025-12-22 10:14 p.m.
Done
alex 2025-12-23 03:13 a.m.
Yay
𝘴𝘰𝘧𝘪𝘦 ♥ 2025-12-23 12:43 p.m.@morale
morale 2025-12-23 03:58 p.m.
Approve
morale 2025-12-23 03:58 p.m.
/s/ mandatorymoralr
shah_khaled ᴘᴄ used /transcript
clerkFlow Bot2026-01-18 10:55 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow Bot2026-01-18 10:55 a.m. Permissions have been synced to
Channel Permissions Synced
Volume XVclerkFlow Bot2026-01-18 10:56 a.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1462475632142454950 Successfully created transcript.
Exported 897 messages